Online
Today

RPL Report Rejection: Causes, Solutions & ACS Approval Tips

To the ICT professionals who are interested in competent migration to Australia, the most crucial document presented to the Australian Computer Society (ACS) tends to be an RPL Report ( Recognition of Prior Learning Report ). It enables applicants to gain their skills regarding ICT using real-life experiences regardless of lacking formal ICT qualifications or inadequate ICT content.

Nevertheless, the phenomenon of RPL Report Rejection is rather usual, and most often, fully preventable. Learning the factors leading to rejection and how to write a solid, plagiarism-free and well-structured RPL report can go a long way to make you more likely to receive ACS approval.

RPL Report Rejection

What Is an RPL Report and Why Is It Important?

It is first vital to know the purpose of the report before getting into the RPL Report Rejection.

An RPL Report is a comprehensive application that ACS needs from its candidates who:

  • Lacks formal ICT qualifications.
  • Hold non-ICT qualifications
  • Possess little ICT coursework in their degree program.
  • Possesses experience in the ICT sector, but no relevant certifications.

The RPL report is usually made up of:

  • Two project reports (under your actual industry experience)
  • The explanation of Key Areas of Knowledge (KAoK).
  • Elaborate employment records.

It is used to prove that, despite not having academic credentials in the area, you have acquired enough knowledge and skills in the IT/ICT area based on professional experience.

Due to ACS being quite strict with your report, ruling against your report possible, mistakes and inconsistencies can automatically cause RPL Report Rejection.

Get Free Consultation

    Our Amazing Features

    ✅  EA Assessed Engineers as CDR Writers
    ✅ 10+ Years of Experience
    ✅ Australia Based Company
    ✅ All Engineering Disciplines
    ✅ 100% Success Rate with EA
    ✅ 100% Plagiarism Free Report  or Turnitin
    ✅ Unlimited Free Modification or Corrections
    ✅ Negative Assessment? Get Refund within 2 hours
    ✅ 24*7 Live Chat, Phone Call and WhatsApp Facility
    ✅ Direct Conversation with The CDR Experts
    ✅ Beat the value offer
    ✅ Complete CDR Before the Agreed Due Date

    Download Sample

    Why Does RPL Report Rejection Happen?

    Your RPL could be rejected by ACS due to a number of large reasons. The first step towards the prevention of such causes is the understanding of these causes.

    1.Plagiarism or Copied Content

    The most prevalent cause of RPL Report Rejection is plagiarism. ACS implements high-tech plagiarism detection services, such as Turnitin, to detect:

    • Cut, paste examples from the Internet.
    • Duplicated information from other applicants.
    • Descriptions that are template-based or repetitive.
    • Artificial intelligence content that is not original.

    ACS anticipates absolutely original experience-based content. It could be that even with publicly available RPL samples used as a reference and slightly rewritten, they can raise a red flag of plagiarism.

    How to avoid this:

    • Compose the report on your own experience in ICT, in real life.
    • Do not utilise ready samples as templates.
    • Make sure that all project descriptions are distinct, and based on the basis of your real duties.

    2.Inadequate Project Descriptions

    Two significant projects have to be described in clear and detailed, and structured explanations in your RPL report. Reports are usually rejected due to:

    • Tasks are vague or generic
    • The project is not in line with the nominated ANZSCO code.
    • There is a lack of adequate technical information.
    • There is no description of instruments, methodology, or processes.
    • Your ICT role is not reflected in your responsibilities.

    Keep in mind that ACS does not want to see the cumulative effort of the team, but your personal input to the project.

    In order to prevent RPL Report Rejection:

    • Make it clear the role you are taking.
    • Add technical detail with the means of tools, platforms, protocols, and methodologies.
    • Identify tasks according to your ANZSCO job role.

    3.Lack of Supporting Documentation

    There are several types of evidence that ACS needs to prove your experience. The lack of documentation or missing information can result in RPL Report Rejection.

    Common issues include:

    • Missing employment history
    • The lack of information about job roles and responsibilities
    • Unverified employment
    • Lack of payslips, contract letters or tax records
    • Disagreement between the report and the reference letter

    This is because you should back up all the assertions in your RPL report with documentation.

    4.Incorrect ANZSCO Code Selection

    The other significant factor in RPL Report Rejection is picking an ANZSCO code that does not reflect your real experience in ICT.

    For example:

    • An applicant who is a Database Administrator but who is submitting an application as A Software Engineer.
    • A System Analyst who works under an ICT Security Specialist and has no relevant activities.
    • Attempts to place your experience in a high-demand ANZSCO code artificially.
    • The ultimate project descriptions cannot be used to cover an unsuitable job category.

    5.Poor English Writing & Unprofessional Structure

    ACS requires the report to be of professional writing and includes:

    • Clear English
    • Logical structure
    • Proper technical terminology
    • Sentences that are grammatically correct
    • Consistent formatting

    Badly written reports tend to be perceived as untrustworthy or unprofessional, which makes them unacceptable.

    6.Over-Exaggeration or False Information

    ACS verifies your claims. If your report includes:

    • Unrealistic achievements
    • Too technical, that is not within your level of experience.
    • Fake or inflated job roles
    • Fabricated projects

    It will be decisively dismissed.

    Integrity is crucial. Go with what you are really good at.

    Consequences of an RPL Report Rejection

    Having an RPL Report Rejection may be very demotions, but the repercussions may be more than some believe, such as:

    • Slows down your migration process
    • Loss of time and money
    • Potential ban period of ACS re-application
    • Your second submission should be scrutinised more thoroughly
    • Rewrite everything that has to be done manually

    That is why the rejection should be avoided in the very first place.

    How to Avoid RPL Report Rejection — Expert Tips

    The following are the professional guidelines to minimise the likelihood of rejection to a large extent:

    Write 100% Original Content

    Your RPL should demonstrate your actual experience in a profession. Although you may employ a professional writer, the details should be based on your real working experience.

    Use the Correct ANZSCO Code

    Select an ANZSCO code that suits your duties, including:

    • 261313 Software Engineer
    • 263111 Computer Network and Systems Engineer
    • 261112 Systems Analyst
    • 262113 ICT Security Specialist
    • 261211 Multimedia Specialist

    Determining the correct code is the key to making sure that your KAoK and project reports are aligned.

    Create Clear and Detailed Project Reports

    Each project should include:

    • Project overview
    • Your job role
    • Business problem addressed
    • Technologies used
    • Methodologies followed
    • Arrangement System design or architecture
    • Implementation details Testing
    • Outputs and achievements

    The more concrete and technical your report is, the better.

    Prepare Strong Employment Evidence

    Make sure that all papers contain:

    • Company letterhead
    • Exact employment dates
    • Job title
    • Detailed responsibilities
    • HR or supervisor signature
    • Contact information in the organization of the CM.

    Backups such as pay slips, tax records, or contracts are a plus to your case.

    Ensure Professional Writing Quality

    A report that is well written not only impresses ACS, but it also does not give rise to misunderstanding.

    Consider having your report:

    • Proofread
    • Edited for clarity
    • Checked for plagiarism
    • Reviewed by an RPL expert
    highest-paying-jobs-in-australia

    Looking for expert CDR Writer for Engineers Australia?

    Creating a CDR Report may be difficult due to Engineers Australia’s standards and rules ( EA ). Our experienced engineers have assisted many people in obtaining approval for their report from the EA via the use of powerful projects.

    How Professionals Can Help Reduce RPL Report Rejection

    ACS Approval Professional RPL writing assistance can vastly increase your approval of ACS. Experts provide:

    • Unused and customized project reports
    • The ANZSCO code should be selected and used correctly
    • Plagiarism-free writing
    • The adherence to ACS guidelines
    • Formatting and proofreading
    • Instructions on gathering employment records

    Other websites, such as CDRforAustralia, focus on assisting candidates in making ACS-compliant RPL reports that are likely to be approved, as well as curbing the chances of rejection.

    Final Thoughts

    RPL Report Rejection is a huge blow to the ICT professionals who want to migrate to Australia. Nevertheless, it is possible to avoid typical mistakes by learning the causes and observing best practices.

    By spending time, effort, and professional advice in your RPL preparation, you will make sure:

    • Proper depiction of your competencies
    • Powerful and effective project reports
    • Proper documentation
    • Higher approval chances
    • An easier migration process

    Your RPL report is not only a necessity, but also an indication of your career experience. Ensure that it is comprehensive, precise, and in accordance with ACS standards.

    Scroll to Top